(CHILD-SAFE TRAVEL-SAFE)
HOLIDAY SNAPSHOTS…PROTECTING YOUNG PEOPLE ON EUROPEAN
EXCHANGES FROM ABUSE (Research 1998 – 1999)
Chris Gould, Chairman
Child-Safe International Ltd
Avon and Somerset Constabulary,
PO Box 37, Valley Road, Portishead, BristolBS20 8QJ, United Kingdom
Tel: + 44 (0) 1275 816131 / Fax: + 44 (0) 1275 816655
email: chris.gould@avonandsomerset.police.uk website: www.child-safe.org.uk
Background
Legislative and regulatory concerns about the policing and control of child sex offenders, convicted or otherwise, has increased both nationally and internationally during the past three to five years. High profile cases in both the United Kingdom and Belgium have focused attention on the best way of combating such offending.
In August 1996 the first “World Congress Against Commercial and Sexual Exploitation of Children” was organised in Stockholm. Several countries subsequently introduced extra-territorial legislation to prosecute citizens who commit crime against children overseas (“sex tourism”) and an increasing interest has been shown in the sex offender “register” concept that was initiated in the USA. Such a register was introduced in the UK under the Sex Offender Act in September 1997. Concerns continue about how to prevent potential child sex offenders gaining employment to work with children. Both the European Union and the Council of Europe have taken decisions with pan-European implications.
The British Government is currently looking at preventing unsuitable people working with children, under the auspices of an interdepartmental working group. Legislation is expected to be introduced in the Spring of 2001 which will lead to the creation of a national Criminal Records Bureau, allowing criminal record checks and, in some cases, intelligence checks to be carried out by employers on such staff. The Premier’s Department, NSW, Australia have been working on a similar piece of legislation earlier this year, entitled “Employment Screening Procedures for Child Protection”.
Following his innovative work with the “Holiday Snapshots…” research, Detective Superintendent Chris Gould has been collaborating with the interdepartmental working group on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers, to ensure that his findings are considered for any future legislation.
Introduction
Just when it seemed that child abuse had infested all possible “child” areas of our society, and that nothing else could shock us or present itself as “new”… along came some extraordinary revelations by two experienced British police officers.
Following exposure that a Spanish boy had been placed within a host family in the policing area of the Avon and Somerset Constabulary, United Kingdom, the father of whom was a known paedophile, Chris Gould and Kaye Jones set about examining school exchanges and the cultural, educational and language commercial business within Europe. They wanted to see exactly who, and what, regulates this multi-billion dollar enterprise.
In April last year, the Home Office awarded a grant to both officers, with a remit to identify the range and extent of child abuse on international visits, focusing primarily upon the European Union. Their research project “Holiday Snapshots…Protecting Young People on European Exchanges from Abuse” has already gained international recognition – even prior to publication. By April 1999, the officers were receiving the Police Research Award for innovation from the Home Secretary Jack Straw MP. By now, this pioneering child protection work of the Avon and Somerset Constabulary, had become known as “Child-safe” and this specialist area of investigation was referred to as
“Child-Safe Travel-Safe”.
For over a year the officers travelled extensively looking at the best practice child protection procedures across the world. The results of their research focus on homestays by young people under the age of 18 and have now been consolidated. The findings were then segmented into a series of practical information books targeted at the main groups involved in organising or using international homestays. The seven books provide practical guidelines on how to set up and monitor child safety policies whilst also providing a solid background of case histories from around the world which illustrate the extent and seriousness of this problem. This paper can only hope to give a brief overview of the issues, findings and recommendations. Further details of the work can be found by accessing the “Child-Safe” website (www.child-safe.org.uk), or by speaking with the authors.
Some things became clear almost immediately. No-one seemed to know the structure of the industry itself, such is its complexity and diversity. The business is totally unregulated and few, if any, checks are being done in respect of host families, agents or organisations. Crimes against children are happening and are either not being reported or the information is suppressed.
The research project was designed to capture anecdotal evidence from across Europe of cases where young people had experienced abuse in this way. These examples were sought in order to establish the range of difficulties that young people were encountering, without speculating as to the scale of the problem unless records and interviews made it statistically possible. This evidence would hopefully reinforce the need for legislation, regulation of controls to be put in place across the European Community. At the very least it would foster debate as to the level of State intervention, raise awareness of the issues, improve self regulation and ultimately lead to enhanced safety and welfare conditions for young travellers.
Objectives
The project has two primary objectives:
- To identify a sample of cases involving child abuse to or by foreign visitors within the European Community, following placements into host families by school exchanges, twinning or other educational or cultural visits.
- To determine how the research findings can be used to assist European Governments, relevant travel organisations or other businesses, language schools, educational authorities or twinning associations in preventing the placement of young people on European exchanges in a home where they are likely to be at risk from abuse.
The project also has three hidden objectives:
- Publicity, to ensure that parents and organisations are made aware of the potential risks inherent with such travel
- To work towards the creation of appropriate legislation or regulation within the UK or Europe
- To publish informative travel books/booklets to targeted audiences offering the best practice and guidance alternatives
Methodology (in brief)
à Press strategy…release of information re research and cases uncovered
à Personal interviews with victims, parents, organisers, agents, schools,
host families
à Focus days held with specialists both in the UK and abroad
à Telephone interviews with organisations, victims etc
à Questionnaires sent to host families, organisations and students
(10,000 – UK only)
à Telephone questionnaire with 54 police forces UK and Channel Islands
à Extensive literature searches, including internet search and document analysis
à Visits to USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, The Netherlands, Belgium,
Spain etc
Research findings
It has been established that this “industry” is extremely diverse and complex, and for some twenty, thirty or even forty years it has existed without any form of regulation. The standards within the businesses vary dramatically from those which have set up their own professional standards body to those ”cowboys” who seasonally set themselves up to make a fast dollar. This can mean, for instance, that children are being placed within homestays that have never been visited, let alone checked. There are many instances where extra children have turned up on the coach and organisers have resorted to knocking on doors randomly in order to find last minute hosts, some have even flicked through telephone directories, ringing locals who may be able to assist and at the same time earn some extra cash.
Within the first three months some 550 cases of abuse had been discovered, ranging from neglect through to emotional, physical and sexual abuse. This was enough to indicate to the authors that there is a problem and from that time their efforts were concentrated on looking for best practice and guidance from which recommendations for change could be made. Whilst the research considers all types of travel that young people under 18 years venture upon; whether it be staying in youth hostels, hotels, igloos or under canvas: 95% of all abuse cases uncovered happened within a homestay environment. The number of recorded cases uncovered during this research now exceeds 1,000.
For many child protection professionals, the cases discovered will not be shocking. They will not be different in any way to those already experienced within their own professional capacities. However, one big difference is that of those first 550 cases which were Europe wide with a handful from New Zealand, Australia, Canada and America; only three had ever reported to any law enforcement agency.
Victims give many reasons for not reporting, for example; not being able to speak the language; putting up with the situation because it is only short stay; lack of understanding in relation to culture, practices or procedures; not having a parent or guardian close by or contactable, nor any other adult with whom they feel comfortable to disclose. In many cases, the use of a telephone to either ring home or contact an adult supervisor or guide is restricted or made difficult by homestay rules. In some situations telephone calls are forbidden. Young people travelling abroad or away from home are vulnerable, some more than others.
If a report is made to agents or organisers, the young person is generally removed from the host family, but that is the full extent of the action taken, leaving an offender or suspect free to host again.
Whilst the research focused on cultural, educational and language visits made by the under 18 year olds travelling abroad, there was little, if any, safety, welfare or pastoral guidance being given by any organisation. Since this work started in the UK the officers have worked closely with the Department for Education and Employment (DfEE), who, following consultation with the authors, have now published “Guidance on Pupil Health and Safety on School Visits” which includes advice about International Visits. The British Incoming Tour Operators Association (BITOA) have also consulted the authors and produced a “Homestay Committee Report” giving advice for homestays. The British Council, ARELS and BASELT have published some of the earlier pieces of guidance issued during this research.
The complexity and diversity of this industry, coupled with apparent under-reporting of incidents of abuse to the authorities, has resulted in law enforcement agencies having little, if any, intelligence or information on this area of criminality. Limited intelligence and involvement, that is: until now. Law enforcement includes not only the police, but Customs and Excise, Immigration, Europol, Interpol, National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS) as well as prosecution lawyers.
Specific Cases
Cases range from children not being fed at all whilst on a visit, to those fed solely on such things as peanut butter or jam in order to save money. Others have slept three to a bed, some sleeping under beds or in a cupboard under the stairs and others as young as seven or eight who have simply been left or abandoned and have quickly found themselves to be lost.
There have been cases where the host family circumstances have changed and visitors have been turned out of the home following domestic disputes or some who were not accepted into the home in the first instance. Many children and young people have been victims of acquisitive crime with property or money being stolen. Some have suffered verbal and racial abuse and we have heard many reports of young people who have been exposed to domestic violence, drug and alcohol abuse by their hosts.
At the more sinister, thin of the wedge, there are known, or suspected, sex offenders or child abusers who have infiltrated the “industry” – either acting as hosts or attaining more prominent positions as language school teachers or even agents or organisers. The researchers came across cases of known paedophiles who have been trafficking vulnerable young people from places like Albania into Europe. At this time, it is difficult to determine the full extent of abuse or the level of such incursion. Suffice to say, that what has been revealed is considered to be just the tip of the iceberg.
There are but a few known, reported cases that have subsequently been investigated and prosecuted. In Perth, Western Australia, a 65 year old organiser was convicted less than two years ago of the sodomy, amongst other crimes, of a 14 year indigenous boy who was en route from the north to stay with a host family in the South West. This man had been abusing vulnerable children on such cultural exchanges for many years.
In Minnesota, USA, A 17 year old French boy who stayed with a host family, was convicted of sexual assault of the 12 year old daughter of his hosts, following several days of molestation.
In Nottinghamshire, UK a host father was convicted of possession of pornographic videos following a disclosure by the young Spanish boy whom it is believed he was sexually attempting to groom.
Scale of the problem
The scale of this problem is unknown due to the inadequate records kept within Europe in respect of youth travel. Essentially, there is no base line from which to begin calculations. However, to give the issue some perspective, estimates from tourist records kept by the British Tourist Authority and the English Tourist Board, indicate that in 1998 some 4 million children under the age of 18 entered the UK. Of those, just over 1 million travelled on what are recorded as independent holidays or studies.
From a European search, the researchers estimate that in 1998 between 5 and 6 million children and young people travelled abroad on cultural, educational or language trips, the majority of which passed without incident. Although impossible to say accurately, the officers’ professional view from the work conducted so far is that in total approximately 4-5% per annum are suffering some form of abuse.
There are some 60+ million school aged children in Europe, so the potential growth in this area of travel is huge. Youth tourism already represents 20% of the world tourist market and this figure is growing. In 1998, within the UK alone, student expenditure was in excess of £1 billion (including course fees, accommodation and travel).
To give a further example of the size and scale to this “industry”, the Federation of International Youth Travel Organisations (FIYTO) represent some 289 member organisations world-wide in 72 different countries. Their turnover per annum is 6 billion US dollars, serving some 14 million young people travelling annually and selling over 6 million air and surface tickets.
Research Methodology
Within the United Kingdom the officers circulated
- 5,280 host family questionnaires
- 1,242 student questionnaires to international visitors within the UK
- 574 questionnaires to school aged pupils (12-14 years)
- 1,260 questionnaires to university students
- 731 questionnaires to organisers
The return rate is at present in excess of 15%, however, responses continue to be received almost daily.
Following the implementation of a media strategy many individuals came forward and face to face interviews were conducted with victims, parents, organisers, agents, teachers and others. An abundance of mail has been received from people with concerns together with supporters of this work and organisations looking to implement changes as well as many individuals who have suffered abuse whilst travelling in this way.
Experiments were conducted in various parts of the UK, and police checks were made on host families employed by certain organisations. In one such experiment, 700 families were checked, 26 had serious convictions for offences such as supplying drugs, armed robbery, indecency offences, serious assaults and two known paedophiles were identified.
Numerous focus days have been held gathering experts together both in the UK and Spain. Searches have been made, throughout Europe and beyond, including both literature trawls and the examination of travel statistics and existing legislation. Meetings have taken place with Europeans from the travel industry, youth exchange, education, child protection charities, law enforcement and others both on a formal and informal basis.
Presentations have been made by the authors at both the House of Commons, UK, and the European Parliament in Brussels highlighting the concerns and problems within this area of youth and student travel. Ministers are now working towards airing these issues within the European Parliament Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs Committee.
Emerging facts from completed host family questionnaires
- only 11.6% of host families were interviewed face to face
- only 13% were obliged to supply references
- around 10% were never visited by the agents or organisations nearly 10% of organisers making a home visit failed to check on students’ sleeping arrangements or facilities
- over half were not asked to sign any form of contract
- only 10.6% of host families received an unannounced visit
- 61.5% work for language schools
- only 25.5% of host families were asked if they would consent to a police check
- only 10.9% were required to look after students’ welfare
- 25.2% of host families said that they had experienced “difficulties” when hosting
- 21.2% of these said the organiser had been “unhelpful” or “very unhelpful” at these times
- 93.9% of host families were given information about their student prior to their arrival
- 65.6% were provided guidance and practical support from the organiser
Recommendations – the way forward
Earlier in this report the use of criminal records was alluded to. The authors are clear, however, that at this time, this is not the answer. A code of practice ensuring a minimum standard of operation must be implemented throughout this industry and criminal record checks may form part of this as an additional safeguard.
The following is a brief synopsis of the detail contained within the travel guide booklets which the authors have produced. The books themselves will contain suggested formats for written documentation, proformas of checklists, examples of forms and full explanations of the bullet points listed below.
- Young people must be protected from harm and their general welfare promoted
- Children have rights – this must be recognised and they must be treated with respect
- Awareness of child protection issues should be raised throughout your organisation – consider addressing the following
– write a mission statement for your organisation
– ensure that you have a child protection policy
– identify a “Child Protection Officer”
- Develop safety procedures which minimise the likelihood of children and young people being harmed and which enable organisers and others to respond effectively to accidents or suspected cases of abuse.
- Empower children and young people and their parents
– give them information about the culture of the country in which they will stay
– tell them where they will be living
– give helpline numbers and emergency contact points
– give everyone involved in the trip an opportunity to feed back about their experiences
– inform parents of all arrangements and itineraries
- Establish links with parents and other relevant organisations, both in this country and abroad
- Create the right environment to ensure a safe and successful experience – the key points are
– Support
– Communication
– Information
– Preparation
Between 18 and 22 August 1999 invitations were extended to over 100 expert delegates from the 29 Council of Europe Countries. These experts, from law enforcement, social services, health, youth travel, education and various children’s charities and non-governmental organisations, together with government and European Commission representatives, heard key note speeches and took part in inter-active workshop sessions. Delegates were given an opportunity to critique the work of the authors and present their personal and organisational perspectives in relation to the issues raised.
The conference concluded with each of the European experts endorsing and validating both the work and the research findings. Undertakings were given that the Child-Safe Travel-Safe guidance would be promoted in each of the Council of Europe countries and lobbying of governments would continue. Through this inaugural network, delegates committed themselves to continue to work in their respective countries, supporting each other to the goal of enhanced welfare, safety and pastoral care of children and young people engaged in international travel.
On 11 October 1999 the Child-Safe Travel-Safe booklets were launched at the House of Commons, London, by Home Office Minister Charles Clarke MP. Other dignitaries present included Senator Landon Pearson, Advisor on Children’s rights, Canadian Senate; Diana Lamplugh, Suzy Lamplugh Trust; Gordon Blakely, British Council; together with representatives from the Department for Education and Employment, The Federation of International Youth Travel Organisations and children’s charities such as Childline and the NSPCC.
You would not send your child to a house at the end of your street if you knew nothing about the person living there. Yet on the strength of a glossy brochure, the payment in some cases of vast sums of money, and an assumption that someone else has asked the right questions, we send our children thousands of miles across the world to stay with strangers.
The companies, organisations and individuals that abuse this blind trust cannot be allowed to continue to profit from it and we must all take responsibility for the care and safety of our young people.
Richard William Mink
Richard Mink
Foreign student exchange 
What The State Department & Exchange Student Industry Don’t Want You To Know….. By,JackSwint & Sam Webber
PART ONE ofourtwo part story takes you first inside of a multi million dollar industry known on the surface as the National Foreign Exchange Student Program. The original concept and intent is easy; it’s a program that became popular after WWII in which a student, typically in secondary or higher education, chooses to live in a foreign country to learn, among other things, the language and culture. Americasponsorsapproximately 30,000 a year.Below the surface, a dark side has evolved that has allowed pedophiles, rapists and common thieves to infiltrate this program and use it as a black market sex slave network that preys on children that we invited into our country. What’s most alarming is that you can actually go online and order upthe student of your choice. View their picture, read their bio and then pick that childto be delivered to your doorstep. (link below) It’s like the old Burger King commercial where you can have it “your way.” Some predators whohave been arrested and convicted of sex crimes against exchange students admit they pre-picked their teen because they wanted to have sex with that specific one.Example: Convicted predators like Frank Swiderski (OH), Peter Ruzzo (CA), and Richard Young (KS), have, in one form or another admitted the desire to have sex with their exchange student simply upon seeing their photo. Ruzzo even considered it a challenge. He accomplished it too. In West Virginia, the exchange program has also fallen prey to students being groomed for sex and violence by a criminal element that has cloaked itself in the form of sponsors, supervisors and host parents. In our state alone, a pedophile network exists that includes pedophiles in at least Kanawha, Cabell, McDowell and Fayette Counties.
Do officials at the board of education know of this problem within the exchange program?? Yes, sources tell us numerous complaints are on file and sealed within the WV State Board of Education that date back years. At least one former teacher-principal had to resign because of his pedophile-rapist acts that the board concealed to head off a scandal. Thomas Scott Kingwas moved around from county to county school systems until they had to finally force his resignation. He still is a host parent and sponsor today. But, over the years he has become involved in a network of pedophiles operating not only in WV, but across the country and abroad.
To most of us we think of the Foreign Exchange Student Program as a chance for teens to come to America and attend our schools and live with host families in the country most foreigners consider the land of freedom and great opportunities. At least that is what the pamphlets, brochures and websites from the business thatoperate these programs detail. What they don’t admit or advertise is that, just in the US alone, this is a multi million dollar industry that generates from $9,000 to $22,000 per student per year. They also hide the fact that some really bad people are intentionally destroying a really good program that was once held beyond reproach.It’s not just about sex. Some host families and sponsors have been convicted of crimes from petty theft to extortion. Several documented cases show that students were placed in the homes of parolee’s with criminal convictions for aggravated assault/robbery and accusations of rape. A retired parole officer in Eugene, Oregon confirmed during a 3-year period supervising sex offenders of five instances of them gaining access to new child victims by becoming hosts to foreign students.The retired officer, stated in a report….. “I learned of 5 instances of sex offenders, in this county, gaining access to new child victims by becoming hosts of foreign students. One was convicted of molesting a 16 year-old Japanese girl. Another convicted sex offender hosted a 17 year-old Japanese boy, but the boy returned home before he could be questioned to determine if he was abused. Another convicted rapist hosted a 18 year-old Japanese girl; she stayed in his home only a few days before the situation became known to authorities and girl was removed, but not before the rapist began touching her inappropriately (grooming behavior, a prelude to raping her.) A year later, this same rapist was accepted by a host organization to host a 16 year-old Thai girl.”
Some students arrive in the US with no hosts; no schools and they are placed in trailer parks and motels or live (contrary to regulations) with coordinators. They are paraded around shopping centers looking for potential hosts. So, what government entity oversees the entire program?? The U.S. State Department, who in turn rely on the same organizations that are making millions of dollars each year. When faced with a serious complaint, the government agencies stance has routinely been that it is a “contractual dispute” with the student’s family and youth exchange organization.
Who tries to oversee all of this?? Watchdog associations and concerned citizens like Danielle Grijalva, founder of the organization, “Committee of Safety for Foreign Exchange Students.” Danielle says the problem is just too big. And, it appears on the surface that one reason no one really wants to address it because so much money is being made in this growing industry. Her efforts have paid off; their organization is now comprised of over 1,500 CSFES volunteers from across the globe. Even their press releases are now translated and appear in over 35 newspapers internationally.
Before becoming an advocate for the abused, Danielle was first an area representative for the Center for Cultural Interchange, a foreign exchange student program based in St. Charles, Ill. She helped find host families for students studying in the U.S., securing high school placement for them as well as advising them on local culture and customs. She is now the watchdog of those people who prey on those innocent students we have invited to our country like the spider to the fly.
Then on Sept. 20, 2004, she learned about what she calls “the dark side” of the foreign exchange program. A 16-year-old exchange student from France sat in her living room and told her that within a month of his arrival his host father photographed him when he was sleeping, showed him online pornography and offered him alcohol. Grijalva instincts as a mother took over and she looked for help from everyone she could think of: local police, employers, school administrators. The more she researched, the more she learned that abuse at the hands of host families or individuals, across the world, was a silent problem.
More than 30,000 students arrive in the U.S. each year through foreign-exchange programs. Grijalva believes abuse can go unreported due to language barriers, cultural differences and student fears that visas may be taken away. Some students have been told if they make a complaint, they will be deported in less then 72 hours. And, they will be sent home in shame.
“I began to ask questions,” she said. “. . . These were invisible victims.”
In 2006, Danielle began obtaining complaints. Right away she documented 54 cases of sexual abuse and even extortion. The state department had only reported 5 cases of sexual abuse for that time period. After her inquiries for copies of those complaints, the state department reluctantly added 20 additional cases of alleged abuse. The state department claims they have invoked stronger policies in placing students with host families and or sponsors such as a criminal background check.
But, as statistics show, most pedophiles and predators have never been convicted of a crime. Some are the pillars of the community concealing their deep dark secrets. Sources we spoke to say some background checks had only consisted of providing 3 references. Complaints from students being raped,sodomized, beaten and robbed are rampant across the United States and have begun escalating over the past 6 years. Stories have echoed back from parents of the children after returning to their homeland questioning if this type of behavior is common in our society.If a student or parent’s complaint makes it up the ladder to overseeing agencies likeAYUSA International, a standard response comes in the form of a “warning letter” to deter any further problems. Reading between the lines, one may decipher this letter as a “shut up”, or youwill be dealt withaccordingly. Up to and including deportation.”We obtained one such warning letter that states to a student complaining of abuse…. “Consequently, the purpose of this letter is to inform you that you are officially on warning with AYUSA and to clarify with you what we expect of you as an AYUSA student. Failure to make an effort to change your behavior/attitude will result in being placed on probation with the AYUSA program.” That letter goes on to say, “…. you were selected for this program because we believe that you have the maturity and capability to deal with the demands of a year in the United States.
AYUSA expects that you will take this warning letter very seriously and will make strides toward changing your attitude and behavior and completing a successful year in the U.S. Weanticipate that you will act, for theremainder of your stay, in a manner befitting anAYUSA student and a junior ambassador of Montenegro. In the end, the studentwas sent home early after posting complaints online of the abuse. To add insult to injury, when a studentis returned home early, these companies refuse to refund the parents money.State & Federal lawsuits against companies s like ASSE, AISE & AYUSA have exposed the reported ongoing problems of abuse and how these companies fail to follow federal statutes that are in place to protect such acts from occurring. But, these types of legal actions can take years to make it into the judicial system. By then, the damageis done, and the student hasreturned back to their country and is trying to deal with the trauma and disgrace we subjected them to. Reports confirm some teens become suicidal; self mutilate themselves, withdrawal from society and even horde food which demonstrates possible starvation tacticshad been used on them to submit to their abuser.More and more arrests and convictions are occurring. In 90% of the cases, the victim knew their assailants. Sadly enough, statistics show that the majority of offenders are the teachers & other school officials who these kids placed all of their trust in!!!
Exchange Students In WV
In November of 2008 we published an expose on former WV teacher & principal Thomas Scott King. His brother, Casey, came forward with overwhelming and shocking information how his older brother had raped and molested him from the age of 7 years old. Last year, Casey went to the WV state police with his complaint. Casey King’s motivation?? To finally face those demons of what his now 60 year old brother had done to him. And, more so, to stop this man who reportedly continues to prey on young teens for his deviant sexual gratification today.
Unfortunately, the WV trooper investigating that complaint retired. To date, no one has resumed the investigation. We have been advised that the new WV Police Commander, Colonel Pack, has spoken to State Police Captain Schoolcraft on or about Tuesday February 10, 2009, and that Schoolcraft and Pack have discussed the filed complaint on Thomas Scott King.
Scott King was considered a hero among students. According to one source, who at the time attended Welch Jr. High, “He was the cool teacher who always bought us booze and took us to WVU ballgames and many school trips.” He went on to say that all of these boys were 13 to 15 at the time and that “we didn’t know what a pedophile was.”
Since that November story, we have continued to investigate and gather information on the fact that, even though Scott King had to resign his teaching credentials years ago for alleged sex abuse, he has remained a member in great standing with the national and local levels of the Foreign Exchange Student Program. He is not just a host dad and sponsor any longer, King is now also a part of a state wide network of pedophiles, some who are prominent and well respected in the community. He has climbed the ladder in this multi-million dollar profit industry and joined the ranks of hosts and sponsors that are better known as a “high placer.”
DanielleGrijalva explained to us the open door possibilities and perks of being a “high placer.” Especially, if the host and sponsor has criminal intent. “There are many volunteers, local coordinators, regional coordinators, directors, etc., within the student exchange community. All are usually responsible for locating and securing host families and high schools for an exchange student.For those volunteers, coordinators, directors, etc., who go ‘above and beyond’ by placing thirty, forty or fifty (plus) exchange students, theyare nicknamed and referred to in this community as a “high placer.” When you consider that the natural parents of these prospective exchange students will spend approx. $8,000 to $22,000 to study abroad as aJ1 participant, a “high placer” becomes very lucrative to the agency they work/volunteer for. Many student exchange agencies are very protective of their “high placers” and stand behindmost every move they make.”According to official records, King has hosted as a parent, supervised or sponsored children from the following countries. Germany, Argentina, Brazil, Czech Republic, Holland, Hungry, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey & Yugoslavia.
Next Friday at 2pm…. Hear from Scott King s victims, and learn the names of prominent & respected people in WV who want to come forward because they know of the inner workings of a multi-county pedophile network. Learn what Scott Kings former students & school faculty members really thought of him.
Read how one former student allegedly recalls waking up naked in a bedroom located in Scott Kings home and having to flee into the night and seek refuge at a neighbors home. Another student from Welch, reportedly was provided alcohol by King and awoke in a motel to find himself naked while King was standing over him taking pictures…
End Of Part One…..
….
Anyone who has questions or information concerning abuse within the Foreign Exchange Student Program is asked to e-mail or call : … Danielle Grijalva … dgrijalva@csfes.org … (760) 295-0716
….
Original story on Thomas Scott King
….
Example of websites that allow you to match & pick your choice of child: Aspect Foundation /
….
Foreign Exchange Organizations With The Highest Complaints & Lawsuits
….
http://www.aspectfoundation.org/
….
http://www.asse.com/
….
http://www.ayusa.org/
….
8 comments:
(uit: http://www.isgp.eu)